15.
"You mentioned this evil world. What is the relation of the Orthodox
Church to this world? What about such things, for example, as the
Church and the State?"
The Church first of all is the experience of the Kingdom of God on
earth. It is a mystery, as we call it; a sacramental experience
and vision of reality. It is that reality itself within which we can
come to a knowledge of God and Communion with Him and all things in Him.
In this sense then, the Church is not merely a human organization or
institution. Although it has organizational and institutional
aspects -- a "human form" -- the Church cannot be reduced to
these things, and essentially it is really none of them. The Church is
not a human organization or institution at all. It is the gift of divine
life in this world.
As far as this world is concerned, the Orthodox
believe that although it is essentially "very good," created
this way by God, it is ruined and spoiled and in the power of evil. It
needs to be healed and purified. In a word, the world needs salvation in
order to be what God made it to be. Because this world is, in its
present ambiguous form, both good and evil at once; and because it
requires salvation in order to be the perfect dwelling-place for God and
man that it was made to be, it will always remain a world of relative
values until being finally transformed by God at the end of the ages. In
this perspective, some form of government is necessary to care for life
in this world in its present relative condition. Christians
traditionally have held that there must be some form of state government
with real power to care for the common good. The state can never be
absolute however, and it may even be evil, in which case it must be
resisted by men who love truth.
There have been in history many alliances between
Church and state in Orthodoxy. These alliances have not always been
happy ones and not seldom have been damaging to the Church and have
required resistance from the Church in the persons of the prophets and
saints. Nevertheless, the Orthodox would insist that for the relative
life of this world, there must be some form of government with equally
relative powers to preserve good order. And the Orthodox should be ready
to be loyal to any such government which does not assume what belongs
properly to God.
16. "This sounds awfully other-worldly! Doesn't the
Church have any more direct relationship to the life of this world and
the good of the human society right now?"
We have already said that the Church is the experience of the life of
the world and of human society as it should be in God. At the liturgy,
for example, we are given the "vision" of what life and
society are all about; what they should be when perfect, filled with the
Presence of God. However, although it has to be clearly understood that
the clergy are strictly forbidden direct involvement in the life of this
world, according to Orthodox canon law, because their sole function is
to stand for the Kingdom of God which is not of this world, Christian
people are not only the clergy, and the Church is not only those who are
in "holy orders." The Church is the whole body of faithful. We
have talked about this before. And the body of believers in God are
certainly in the world bearing witness in every possible way -- social,
political, economic -- to that very Kingdom which is not of this world.
And if, as we have said, the purpose of man is to become holy and
godlike and to suffer for truth and love in communion with Christ
Himself, then it must be seen that there is no other place for man to do
these things than in this present world right here and now.
Thus, although the church as the church cannot
possibly be reduced to the relative categories of this world, the
Christians who live in this world must certainly use every means
available to make this world as much as possible the expression of that
Kingdom of God which is to come in the final revelation of Christ. They
must know as well that they will never succeed absolutely in their
efforts and will usually be greatly resisted. We come once again to the
significance of the cross. Also it must be mentioned that since the
values of this world are always relative, and the concrete action of
witnessing to the Kingdom of God is not always that simple and easy to
determine, each individual Christian must be left free to make his
political decisions and actions according to his own conscience. The
Church can give principles and provide the vision of perfection, but it
cannot dictate concrete policies and actions in this or that given
instance.
17. "What about the Orthodox relation to war?"
The fact that the Orthodox have blessed the
military seems to contradict your entire position, not to mention the
teaching of Jesus about non-violence. On the contrary, we would hope
that the Orthodox position relative to the military supports what we
have already discussed. Christ taught that perfection requires the love
of enemies and the absolute renunciation of resisting evil by evil. Thus
if a man will be perfect he will renounce the relative values of this
world totally and will not participate in any act which is morally
ambiguous. In this way, for example, the Church forbids the bearing of
arms to its clergy and does not allow a man to continue in the ministry
who has shed blood, theoretically even in an accidental way! However,
the Orthodox Church follows Christ and the apostles in teaching that the
relative and morally ambiguous life of this world requires the existence
of some form of human government which has the right and even the duty
to "wield the sword" for the punishment of evil.
In the Gospels, for example, we do not find Christ
or John the Baptist of the apostles commanding the soldiers which they
met to cease being soldiers. Even the early Christians bore the arms of
the pagan Roman state for the welfare of society in this world. But
still, if a man will be perfect and give his life totally to Christ, he
will of necessity renounce military service as well as any political
service which always and of necessity is involved with relativistic
values and greater and lesser evils and goods. Such a man will also
renounce his possessions and follow Christ totally and in everything.
Thus total pacifism is not only possible, it is the
sign of greatest perfection, the perfection of the Kingdom of God.
According to the Orthodox understanding, however, pacifism can never be
a social or political philosophy for this world; although once again, a
non-violent means to an end is always to be preferred in every case to a
violent means. When violence must be used as a lesser evil to prevent
greater evils, it can never be blessed as such, it must always be
repented of, and it must never be identified with perfect Christian
morality. Also, one final point of great importance is that Christians
who are involved in the relativistic life of this world must resist
military conscription when the state is evil. But when doing so they
must not yield to anarchy, but must submit to whatever punishment is
given so that their witness will be fruitful.
18. "How do you reconcile this position of not only
with the past history of the Orthodox Church which seems to have
violated it, but with the Orthodox participation in ecumenical groups as
the World and National Councils of Churches which have taken positions
on concrete political issues?"
In the first place, relative to the Orthodox past,
it is impossible to find any saint or teacher of the Church who would
say that Christians can be perfect while participating in the secular,
political, and military affairs of this world. In societies where the
rulers were Christians, however, the Church would always urge the most
humane government, and there have been cases in which saints blessed the
national powers to bear arms, as the only alternative to what was
understood to be a human catastrophe. Nowhere however can you find the
Church itself recruiting soldiers or blessing the use of violence as
such. As we have mentioned, there have been intimate alliances of Church
and state in Orthodox history, but the number of churchly prophets,
saints, and martyrs who have resisted the identity of church and nation
is endless and can be easily documented.
About the present participation of the Orthodox in
ecumenical organizations, we can say generally that the Orthodox have
understood the necessity of their participation, or at least their
representation, as following from the desire that all men would be
united in the truth and love of Christ. There are, of course, unhappy
exceptions where some Orthodox participate for less worthy reasons, and
these should be lamented.
Concerning the secular policies of these ecumenical
organizations, the record is rather clear that all of the Orthodox,
regardless of their motives for participation, have been virtually
unanimous in their lack of sympathy for this type of political action
and have generally made their dissatisfaction known. It bears repeating
also on this point that the Orthodox have never been opposed to
statements of Christian principles on any issue: social, economic,
legal, military ... What has been opposed however is the assumption on
the part of churches or ecumenical agencies and organizations of the
right to promote or support specific policies, actions, parties,
candidates, etc.
19. "What about such very specific issues as divorce
and birth control and abortion?
What do you have to say about such things?"
These important issues all bear upon the
appreciation of the family, and generally we can say without hesitation
that the Orthodox understand the family to be willed by God as a created
expression of His own uncreated life. Thus, in principle, the family
must be preserved and glorified as something divinely and eternally
valuable. Regarding divorce, the Orthodox follow Christ in recognizing
it as a tragedy and a lack of fulfillment of marriage as the reflection
of divine love in the world. The Church teaches the uniqueness of
marriage, if it will be perfect, and is opposed to divorce absolutely.
If, however, a marriage breaks down and collapses,
the Orthodox Church does in fact allow a second marriage, without
excommunication, that is, exclusion from Holy Communion, if there is
repentance and a good chance that the new alliance can be Christian.
More than one marriage in any case, however, is frowned upon. It is not
allowed to the clergy, and the service of second marriage for laymen is
a special rite different from the sacrament as originally celebrated.
The control of the conception of a child by any means is also condemned
by the Church if it means the lack of fulfillment in the family, the
hatred of children, the fear of responsibility, the desire for sexual
pleasure as purely fleshly, lustful satisfaction, etc. Again, however,
married people practicing birth control are not necessarily deprived of
Holy Communion, if in conscience before God and with the blessing of
their spiritual father, they are convinced that their motives are not
entirely unworthy. Here again, however, such a couple cannot pretend to
justify themselves in the light of the absolute perfection of the
Kingdom of God.
As to abortion, the Church very clearly and
absolutely condemns it as an act of murder in every case. If a woman is
with child, she must allow it to be born. In regard to all of the very
difficult cases, such as a young girl being raped or a mother who is
certain to die, the consensus of Orthodox opinion would be that a
decision for abortion might possibly be made, but that it can in no way
be easily justified as morally righteous, and that persons making such a
decision must repent of it and count on the mercy of God. It must be
very clear as well that abortion employed for human comfort or to stop
what a contraceptive method failed to prevent, is strictly considered by
the canon laws of the Church to be a crime equal to murder.
20. "What you say sounds super-human. Is it really
reasonable to expect the people to do it? Indeed, who can do it?"
The question about who can do it was asked a long
time ago. St. Peter asked it of Christ when he was listening to His
teachings. The answer of Christ was conclusive: "With men these
things are impossible. But with God all things are possible." This
is the point. Christian morality is, strictly speaking, not a human
morality designed for the happy life in this world. Christian morality
is the morality of perfection. "Be perfect as your Father in heaven
is perfect." These are the words of Christ in the Sermon on the
Mount. Such a morality in this world is really open-ended. It is never
complete. As a matter of fact, it is the teaching of the Orthodox Church
that man's life is never complete even in the Kingdom of God. Man will
always be "on the way." His very perfection, as one saint put
it, is always to grow more perfect. To be as perfect as God is
impossible to men.
But to move toward this perfection eternally and
forever is within man's possibilities with the help of God. And this is
the life and the moral position to which Christians are called. The
Church is always ready to forgive the sinner, since Christ is the Head
of the Church and He has come exactly to save sinners. But while
condescending to forgive every sort of sin and weakness and necessity to
indulge in relativistic and morally ambiguous actions (such as warfare
and politics and birth control...), the Church cannot give these actions
complete approval and cannot change its gospel which proclaims that man
is created for the Kingdom of God and divine perfection.
21. "You talk about the Kingdom of God continually.
What is this Kingdom of God?"
The Kingdom of God is what Christ has brought to
the world. The Gospel is full of Christ's insistence that the Kingdom of
God is given to men by His coming. It is a Kingdom not of this world,
but of God, a Kingdom of everlasting life in union with God, the
Trinity. Thus, we define the Kingdom of God as life in and with God. The
Orthodox believe that this life is communicated to men in the Church
through Christ and the Holy Spirit. It is a life where men worship and
obey God and do His will by the presence and power of His spirit. One
saint has even defined the Kingdom of God as life in the Holy Spirit,
which is the same definition given by Orthodox to the Christian Church
itself.
What we know in the Church, in the Holy Spirit, of
communion with God the Father through Jesus Christ, remains still a
mystery. The Kingdom is really here, but in symbol and sacrament. At the
end of the ages this Kingdom will come with observation, with power and
glory, when Christ will be revealed and God will be "all in
all." Thus because we Orthodox believe that the Kingdom is already
given to those who believe, and that the righteous dead have even a
greater access to this Kingdom than we have on earth because of our
mixture with the evil of this age, we insist that "heaven" is
not a locatable place within the space of our created universe, but a
spiritual, divine, condition of existence which will fill the universe
at the end of time. It is "eternal life" already revealed to
the saints in death and to the holy people of God within the sacramental
life of the Christian Church.
22. "We have not talked much about the Church
itself. For example, what about the Bible? Do the Orthodox use the Bible
as other Christians do?"
For the Orthodox, the Bible is the book of the
Church, written by and for those who believe in God and constitute His
People. The Four Gospels are the center of the Bible, just as Christ is
the center of the Church. For this reason the Four Gospels are always
enthroned on the altar in the Orthodox Church building. The Orthodox
generally interpret the Bible in terms of Christ. In this sense, the Old
Testament is partial in that it prepares for the time of Christ, the
Messiah, who fulfills its message and history.
The New Testament writings are also centered around
Christ and tell of His action in the world and in the Church through the
Holy Spirit. Thus the Orthodox position about the Bible, would be that
the New Testament is prefigured in the Old, and the Old Testament s
fulfilled in the New.
The Bible is central in the life of the Church and
gives both form and content to the Church's liturgical and sacramental
worship, just as to its theology and spiritual life. Nothing in the
Orthodox Church can be opposed to what is revealed in the Bible.
Everything in the Church must be biblical. The Bible itself, however,
not only determines and judges the life of the Church, but is itself
judged by the Church since it "comes alive" and receives its
proper interpretation and significance only within the life of the
Church as actually lived and experienced by the People of God. This
would be the basic Orthodox approach to the Bible. Very sadly however,
it must be mentioned that the knowledge of the Bible among Orthodox is
not very great. There is a conscious attempt
being made today to renew the reading and meditation of the scriptures
by the faithful of the Church.
23. "What about the sacraments? How many are there?
How does the Orthodox Church understand them?"
First of all we must say that traditionally the
Orthodox never counted the sacraments. The number of seven was adopted
in Orthodoxy very recently under the influence of the Roman Catholic
Church. Traditionally the Orthodox understand everything in the Church
to be sacramental. All of life becomes a sacrament in Christ who fills
life itself with the Spirit of God. The Orthodox baptize infants as well
as adults as the new birth into the new life of Christ. Baptism is
understood and celebrated as the person's participation in the death and
resurrection of Christ. It is the person's Easter as he is born again
into life eternal. Chrismation (or confirmation) is the
"sealing" of the new life in Christ by the life-creating
Spirit. In Chrismation the person receives the "seal of the gift of
the Holy Spirit" in order to have the power to live the new life in
the new humanity of Christ. In this sense, chrismation is the person's
personal Pentecost just as baptism is his Easter. Holy Communion is the
"sacrament of sacraments" in that it is the banquet of the
Kingdom of God, the fulfillment of every other sacrament. In Holy
Communion we partake of the Body and Blood of Christ, the Eternal
Passover Lamb, Who makes us alive and holy with Himself. Through Holy
Communion we become sons of God the Father, together with Jesus, filled
with the "communion of the Holy
Spirit."
Marriage in Christ allows our human love to become
divine and unending. There is no "until death do us part". The
point is just the opposite. Christ comes to our human love, frees
it from sin and grants it everlasting joy in His Kingdom of love. By our
anointing of the sick in Christ's name, we consecrate our sufferings
with the sufferings of Christ and we are healed by Him; if not for
more time in this world,